x
Black Bar Banner 1
x

NEW: About Me Look — turn on a full-width dark About Me from your profile Configuration (Profile Page Upgrade). The Academy, profile feeds and Media Feed now read like the News Feed. See Subscriptions »

New: AI Blog Autopilot — free for the next 30 days. Switch it on by November 15th »

NEW: Smart Mail is live — free for every member. Send broadcasts, build lists and run autoresponders. Open Smart Mail »

New training: The Campaign Map. Watch it now »

A+ A−
Ads by Markethive - View All
The Blog Feed
The Blog Feed
» Blog Feed
Write a New Blog Post
Search Blog Status
Most Viewed
Most Recent
Most Shared
Alphabetical
Markethive Blog (default)
My Blog Posts
Friends' Blogs
Blog Categories
All
Advertising
Blockchain & Cryptocurrency
Business Development
Diet & Weight Loss
Environmental
Health and Wellness
History and Culture
Home and Garden
Marketing
Mentoring & Training
Money & Finance
Other
Political
Prayer & Religion
Programming & Technical
Real Estate
Search Engine Optimization
Social Media
Spirituality
Sports & Recreation
Transport
Travel & Events
Website Design
Blogging Tools & Assets
My Blog Info
Members Subscribed to You
Blogs You Are Subscribed To
Website Widget
Wordpress Plugin
Subscribe for Greater Services
Subscribe to one of many subscriptions, each one includes the previous ones.. Unlock powerful tools, advance features, to build a powerful reach.

Big Banks Push New FDIC Re-Funding 'Trick'

Posted by Craig Reaser on May 21, 2023 - 10:05pm


Not satisfied with the billions in interest they're earning on excessive reserves, or the unlimited faculties The Fed opened up with the BTFP to bail out regional banks' losses on their bond portfolios,The Wall Street Journal reports that banks have spent the past week or so testing a cunning plan to push more losses onto the US taxpayer. Instead of paying the billions of dollars they collectively owe to replentish the federal deposit insurance fund, they want to use Treasurys instead of cash.  Sounds good right...? Except those Treasuries are trading notably below par and the government will accept them as par, implicitly paying a premium on the bonds...This would put even more of the banks' balance-sheet-clogging losses on the US taxpayer's shoulders.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               This is a nuanced (but crucial) difference to the Bank Term-Financing Plan (BTFP) which offers a loan or swap for the discounted bond at par...with a limited horizon (which will always be extended though) - instead of this FDIC debacle which is simply a trade - bank gives FDIC 90c bond for every $1 it owes them!  At issue is a so-called special assessment the FDIC has proposed for large banks to recoup losses to the deposit insurance fund tied to big institutions that collapsed in March. The agency is soliciting public comment on the proposal for about two months. Wall Street Journal reports that an FDIC spokeswoman said the agency's rules don't allow banks to pay it in Treasurys. But the FDIC welcomes public comment on the rules, she said.  Which sounds a lot like "ok, great idea."                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Accordng to people familiar with the proposal, WSJ reports that Paying with Treasurys also would give banks a modest break on their special assessment, if they can get face value for bonds that have declined about 10%. Supporters say the government would hold the securities until maturity, allowing them to recover principal and interest on the debt. The government (US taxpayer) would suffer no losses, they say. Sure...                                 So let's just clarify:  When yields decline - the banks gain as the bond prices rise... Buy when rates go up (and bond prices decline and crush their balance sheets) they demand a bailout at par (because hey, USTs will 'never default" right, and will be 'money good' sometime in the future).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    In the meantime, we have a quick question - can US taxpayers pay their taxes in the same manner - with bonds trading below par? Askng for a friend?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        by TYLER DURDEN   ZEROHEDGE.COM