
Humans are unusual in that we routinely drink another species’ milk, especially in adulthood, but the statement “humans are the only mammals that drink another animal’s milk” needs a couple of important clarifications.
Among mammals in the wild, humans are the only species known to systematically obtain, store, and regularly consume the milk of other species as a normal, culturally transmitted behavior (milking cows, goats, sheep, etc.). This is what most scientists mean when they say humans are “unique” in this regard: it’s about sustained, organized use of other animals’ milk, not rare or opportunistic events.
Biologically, the striking part is not that humans drink milk, but that many humans can digest it as adults.
So evolutionarily, the odd thing is that some adult humans can digest fresh milk easily, not that humans try to drink it.
Your excerpt already names some non-mammal examples, which are good counters to the absolutist claim:
These are birds, not mammals, but they show that cross-species milk drinking is not uniquely human in the animal kingdom.
Among mammals:
If you’re writing or revising content, you might phrase it like this (short and accurate):
Humans are the only mammals that systematically produce, collect, and consume the milk of other species into adulthood, thanks to dairying cultures and genetic mutations for lactase persistence. Although many mammals will drink another species’ milk when humans provide it, and some birds have been observed stealing milk from mammals in the wild, no other mammal relies on another species’ milk as a regular, culturally transmitted part of its adult diet.
This keeps the strong, attention-grabbing claim, but builds in the nuance your sources point to:
James Eckburg
