x
Black Bar Banner 1
x

Alert!  New Secured Wallets are installed! new Blog system with AI  power and auto blog curation coming soon  Alert! 

Ads by Markethive - View All
Blogs
The Blog Feed
Write a New Blog Post
Search Blog Status
Most Viewed
Most Recent
Most Shared
Alphabetical
Blog Main Menu
Markethive Blog (default)
All Blogs
My Blog Posts
Friends' Blogs
Blog Categories
All
Advertising
Blockchain & Cryptocurrency
Business Development
Diet & Weight Loss
Environmental
Health and Wellness
History and Culture
Home and Garden
Marketing
Mentoring & Training
Money & Finance
Other
Political
Prayer & Religion
Programming & Technical
Real Estate
Search Engine Optimization
Social Media
Spirituality
Sports & Recreation
Transport
Travel & Events
Website Design
Blogging Tools & Assets
My Blog Info
Members Subscribed to You
Blogs You Are Subscribed To
Website Widget
Wordpress Plugin

Brad Silverberg, Co-founder Fuel Capital; Partner at Ignition Partners; Microsoft SVP (1990-99)
844.3k Views • Most Viewed Writer in Chief Executive Officers
The answer to this question needs to be read in conjunction with the answer to the “best decisions” one. Brad Silverberg's answer to What were Bill Gates's best decisions as CEO? One of the things I learned at Microsoft is that being smart is not the same as being right.  As smart as Bill and many of the people were, some bad decisions were made. 

Top of the list for me is that Bill did not engage – either himself or the company – in the political process early enough.  When Microsoft’s competitors were effectively lobbying the government, Bill’s attitude was the government should just go away and leave Microsoft alone.  In his view the company was competing hard but fairly; it was creating value for customers and that should be enough.  Well, this approach of not constructively engaging the government and concerned politicians, of not alleviating  concerns that were not going to go away, was a disaster.  The US federal government, many states, and the EU all essentially declared war on Microsoft, and Microsoft paid a devastating price. 

Intel did a better job figuring out how to negotiate with the government and avoided the catastrophic fate Microsoft suffered.  Google has done a better job with the US government but it seems the EU is on Google’s case now.

Bill also had a difficult time figuring out how to respond to the opportunity / threat of the Internet. It’s understandable.  When you own Windows in the late 90’s, life is good and why would you want things to change?  Bill’s view was to protect Windows, and didn’t come up with an approach that kept Windows and Microsoft’s systems strategy at the forefront.  The result is that Microsoft’s strategic position declined in the 2000’s.  It’s now coming to grips with the new reality and making necessary, if belated, changes.

Bill’s pursuit of Longhorn led to the debacle that was Vista, though Bill was Chief Software Architect, not CEO, at the time.
Written Fri • View Upvotes • Answer requested by Marc Bodnick, David Friedman, and 67 more