x
869,348 views
•Jan 25, 2021
Douglas Murray and I discuss, among other topics, the collapse of grand narratives on the left and the right alike, the potential for the resultant explanatory and motivational void to be filled by more radical ideological ideas, and the dangers posed by the mutual recrimination that all-too-frequently characterizes relationships across the left-right divide.
Comments...
I respect both men here, but they seem to be ignorant of anything other than the MSM interpretation of the U.S. election. They are both familiar with the intellectual dishonesty of the MSM and big tech, yet they unquestioningly accept the narrative here. This is not about Trump. This is about establishment corruption and their power consolidation. This is about decades of gaslighting by the oligarchy.
I love you both! BUT, think you’re a bit out of your wheel house on this analysis. Both left and right. You do NOT understand conservatism; which I’ve said since your Jonathan Haidt interviews. And you really don’t get trump voters. It’s not about Trump. It’s about policy that works and saves Americanism in the process. I didn’t hear you talk about policy in the 1 hour and 20 minutes we listened before turning off. It may seem difficult to understand, but We simply don’t think in terms of payback or vindictiveness. We just want to get on with our lives, which is the conservatives # 1 problem. The media has sold even you a bill of goods on Orange man bad. He was not the monster to the media belabored. I was most disappointed by the lack of recognizing that 95% of the media lies all day long every day. How can you analyze anyone or any group when you can’t yourselves know what are lies? Also, Trump voters may verbalize their support for their team symbolized by Trump but we were just happy to have common sense in policy and it was common sense that recognized that even though Trump may not have won, but there was certainly corruption in the conduction of the voting that we’re expected not to believe our own eyes about. By the way, all but one case brought before the election courts were thrown out on technicalities, not on merit. None of those judges saw the evidence.
It doesn't require a massive judicial and senatorial conspiracy to explain fear of confronting election fraud. It only requires recognizing that many players were afraid of confronting it. The rulings against Trump were not based on evidence, but on excuses to refuse to hear the evidence. No calm weighing of evidence occurred in the overwhelming majority of court rulings.
