x
Black Bar Banner 1
x

Alert!  New Secured Wallets are installed! new Blog system with AI  power and auto blog curation coming soon  Alert! 

Ads by Markethive - View All
Blogs
The Blog Feed
Write a New Blog Post
Search Blog Status
Most Viewed
Most Recent
Most Shared
Alphabetical
Blog Main Menu
Markethive Blog (default)
All Blogs
My Blog Posts
Friends' Blogs
Blog Categories
All
Advertising
Blockchain & Cryptocurrency
Business Development
Diet & Weight Loss
Environmental
Health and Wellness
History and Culture
Home and Garden
Marketing
Mentoring & Training
Money & Finance
Other
Political
Prayer & Religion
Programming & Technical
Real Estate
Search Engine Optimization
Social Media
Spirituality
Sports & Recreation
Transport
Travel & Events
Website Design
Blogging Tools & Assets
My Blog Info
Members Subscribed to You
Blogs You Are Subscribed To
Website Widget
Wordpress Plugin

Bring Back the Bits! Adam Back Argues To Scrap Bitcoin “Sats”

Posted by Andries Van Tonder on December 07, 2020 - 6:27am Edited 12/7 at 6:28am


Bring Back the Bits! Adam Back Argues To Scrap Bitcoin “Sats”

The CEO of Blocksteam said that satoshis are too confusing and bits should come back as the smallest unit of Bitcoin measurement.

In brief

  • Blockstream CEO Adam Back said that the Satoshi unit of measurement—the sat—is too confusing.
  • He said using bits to measure fractions of a Bitcoin is far easier.
  • Crypto Twitter seemed to agree with him.

Adam Back, the CEO of blockchain technology company Blockstream, has said that Bitcoiners should forget about the Satoshi unit of measurement, known as the “sat.”

The computer scientist yesterday wrote on Twitter that it was “Time for a bits reboot” and that “sats [satoshis] are confusing.” 

Satoshis—named after Bitcoin’s anonymous creator—are units measuring the smallest amount of Bitcoin: one hundred-millionth of a coin. 

But according to Back, who has been studying Bitcoin since its inception, we should revert back to using bits as the smallest unit of measurement because it’s easier.

 He also said that there has been “universal newcomer confusion” with buying fractions of a Bitcoin and that, “You still have sats, just bits and bitcents (aka sats), like dollars and cents.” 

The crypto-community lapped up Back’s idea on Twitter. Crypto-anarchist David Burkett wrote: “I couldn't agree more. Sats have always seemed too small and abundant to reason about. Dividing by 100 mil is also much less natural than dividing by 1 mil.”

While Bitcoin maximalist, the pseudonymous “Bitcoin Arthur Morgan,” said: “I totally agree with you on this. We should use bits more. After the coming bull market is finished, exchanges can denominate the BTC price per bit.”

And the co-founder of computing platform Blockstack agreed that “Bits is a much simpler mental model.”

In perhaps the simplest argument, Back went on to add that: “There is something poetic about a Bitcoin being made of bits.” 

Bring back the bits! 

Bits measure one millionth of a coin. “1million is much easier than 100mil base,” he wrote. “Even Bitcoin-qt (core) had bits for years.”

Back went on to say, “a Bitcoin is too expensive, but sats are too many, sound cheap and confusing.” That’s “hard to figure out what you bought,” he said. He noted that if the price of Bitcoin reaches $1 million, a bit will still be cheap—at $1

Andries Van Tonder Thanks Caleb
December 7, 2020 at 6:25pm
Caleb Mpamei I am ok with whichever one!
December 7, 2020 at 6:05pm
Andries Van Tonder Thank you Thomas
December 7, 2020 at 12:40pm