
The idea that, when it comes to health, men are reckless or clueless fools is a simplistic caricature that has been blown away
The idea that, when it comes to health, men are reckless or clueless fools is a simplistic caricature that has been blown away, hopefully once and for all, by a new very large multinational survey commissioned by Sanofi Consumer Health Care. Its publication was very timely in November which has been designated “Movember.” Alongside Men’s Health Week in June, “Movember” is the largest worldwide annual event focusing attention on men’s health.
Some 16,000 men and women in eight countries, including the USA, were asked about their attitudes and behaviors in the area of self-care.
Global Action on Men’s Health was one of the survey’s collaborating organisations, along with several of our member organisations, including the U.S.-based Men’s Health Network and the Men’s Health Education Council.
Men’s health is far worse than it need be. From a global perspective, the gap between male and female life expectancy is significant: in 1980, men’s lives were, on average, four years shorter than women’s; by 2015, the difference was six years; and, by 2030, the male:female health ‘gap’ is predicted to grow to seven years. This large difference is not just a problem in low-income countries—in 2015, men died five years sooner than women in the wealthier countries.
Men also live fewer years in good health. Globally, men can expect a ‘healthy life expectancy’ that is three years below women’s. In the wealthier countries, the healthy life expectancy gap is four years.
The excess health burden facing men has many causes. As a result of male socialization and the failure of health systems to initiate approaches known to be effective for men, too many continue to take too many risks with their health by smoking, drinking too much alcohol, eating a poor diet, driving dangerously, and under using a range of primary care services. (In a recent survey by the American Academy of Family Physicians, 30% of men said they would ‘wait as long as possible’ before seeing a doctor.) The nature of many men’s occupations, which exposes them to a wide range of hazards, is also a significant factor.
Poor health is not inevitable for men. It is not genetic in origin, except perhaps to a small degree. We now know more than enough about how to support men to take better care of themselves and improve the accessibility of health services. One significant European example is Eurofit. This project works with professional soccer clubs in several countries to engage overweight men in diet and physical activity programs. It is a good example of how a male-targeted intervention can make a significant and measurable impact.
A systematic, multi-sectoral approach led by health policymakers and providers is now required and the development of national men’s health policies would be a very good place to start. The national men’s health policy in Ireland is known to have made a significant impact and could be replicated in many more countries and even globally by the World Health Organisation (WHO). A men’s health perspective should also be integrated into all other relevant policies, such as policies for cancer, cardiovascular disease, obesity, or diabetes.
The Global Men’s Health Survey—the most comprehensive international survey of men’s health published to date—can contribute to the momentum for change, particularly in the field of self-care. The standout findings include:
