x
Black Bar Banner 1
x

Alert!  New Secured Wallets are installed! new Blog system with AI  power and auto blog curation coming soon  Alert! 

Ads by Markethive - View All
Blogs
The Blog Feed
Write a New Blog Post
Search Blog Status
Most Viewed
Most Recent
Most Shared
Alphabetical
Blog Main Menu
Markethive Blog (default)
All Blogs
My Blog Posts
Friends' Blogs
Blog Categories
All
Advertising
Blockchain & Cryptocurrency
Business Development
Diet & Weight Loss
Environmental
Health and Wellness
History and Culture
Home and Garden
Marketing
Mentoring & Training
Money & Finance
Other
Political
Prayer & Religion
Programming & Technical
Real Estate
Search Engine Optimization
Social Media
Spirituality
Sports & Recreation
Transport
Travel & Events
Website Design
Blogging Tools & Assets
My Blog Info
Members Subscribed to You
Blogs You Are Subscribed To
Website Widget
Wordpress Plugin

Ripple, Kraken Legal Chiefs Weigh in on Court Decision in SEC's Crypto Securities Lawsuit

Posted by Bill Rippel on August 25, 2024 - 2:11am


Ripple, Kraken Legal Chiefs Weigh in on Court Decision in SEC's Crypto Securities Lawsuit

The chief legal officers at Kraken and Ripple have weighed in on the Federal Court for the Northern District of California’s recent decision in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s lawsuit against Kraken. “Another court, this time in the Kraken case, confirms there’s no such thing as a ‘crypto asset security.’ Bad news for the SEC, whose entire regulation-by-enforcement strategy hinges on that failed premise,” said Ripple’s chief legal officer.

‘Bad News for the SEC,’ Says Ripple’s Legal Chief

Marco Santori, the chief legal officer at cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, commented on the ruling by the Federal Court for the Northern District of California on Friday. The court denied Kraken’s request to dismiss a lawsuit by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) claiming that certain crypto tokens traded on Kraken’s platform are considered securities.

“Today, the Federal Court for the Northern District of California ruled, as a matter of law, that none of the tokens trading on Kraken are securities,” Santori stated, emphasizing: “This is a significant win for Kraken, for the principle of clarity and for crypto users everywhere. It also confirms Kraken’s long-standing position that it does not list securities.”

Additionally, Santori noted that the court criticized the SEC’s definition of “crypto asset security” as “unclear at best and confusing at worst,” while also questioning the SEC’s portrayal of Kraken’s stance on requiring a “written contract” for a security classification.

The Kraken legal chief added:

Fundamentally, the court in Kraken’s case made the same distinction as in the Ripple case: A token isn’t a security, but agreements around a token could be.

Santori further emphasized the broader consequences for the crypto industry, warning that the SEC’s enforcement-based regulatory approach could lead to “extensive, expensive, and time-consuming discovery” for numerous transactions. He urged Congress to establish a comprehensive market structure framework to ensure regulatory clarity and promote the growth of blockchain technology.

He concluded: “Today’s ruling confirms what we’ve been saying all along: the SEC cannot credibly regulate crypto by enforcement.”

Commenting on Santori’s remarks, Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, stated on X:

Another court, this time in the Kraken case, confirms there’s no such thing as a ‘crypto asset security.’ Bad news for the SEC, whose entire regulation-by-enforcement strategy hinges on that failed premise.

Simon Keighley It\'s interesting to see another court case affirming that \'crypto asset securities\' aren\'t recognized. Thanks for the update.
August 25, 2024 at 5:07am